Your scraper keeps getting flagged at ZIP-code level, and the proxy provider you picked can’t tell Ohio from Oregon. Price monitoring breaks the moment a retailer geofences by state. SERP tracking returns the wrong local pack because the exit node landed three cities away from where it should. Add in rotating sessions that die mid-crawl, CAPTCHA walls that eat your request budget, and a subscription plan billing you for traffic you never touched, and the frustration compounds fast.
Teams running price monitoring, SEO tracking, or ad verification at scale need something narrower: real US residential IPs, precise city and state targeting, and pricing that doesn’t punish variable usage. The providers below get judged on exactly that.
How I Narrowed This List
I spent time going through customer feedback on Trustpilot and G2 to see how teams actually rate these providers first-hand, since marketing pages rarely mention block rates or support response times. Where a provider kept surfacing in scraping and data-engineering discussions I follow, that weighed heavily. I also checked whether each one publishes real geo-targeting depth (country vs. State vs. City vs. ZIP) rather than vague “global coverage” claims.
Pricing transparency mattered too. If I couldn’t find out whether a plan expires unused traffic or locks users into a subscription, I flagged it. I looked for published success-rate data or independent testing where available, since self-reported numbers without a third party behind them are close to meaningless. Team fit came last: some of these are built for solo developers, others assume a multi-seat enterprise buyer, and that distinction shapes who each one actually suits.
What Actually Matters for US Geo-Targeting
Picking a residential proxy provider for US-focused work comes down to a handful of concrete factors, not marketing copy.
Geo-targeting granularity
Country-level targeting is table stakes. The real differentiator is whether a provider supports state, city, ZIP, and ASN-level targeting without forcing an enterprise contract to unlock it.
Pool size and sourcing
A large IP count means nothing if the pool is stale or resold from unclear sources. Consent-based sourcing through apps and SDKs tends to hold up better against detection systems than recycled pools.
Session control
Rotating sessions suit high-volume scraping; sticky sessions suit checkout flows, account management, and anything that needs a stable identity for minutes or hours.
Pricing model
Pay-as-you-go traffic versus monthly subscriptions changes the math a lot for teams with lumpy usage – a big scrape one week, nothing the next.
Success rate and latency
A proxy that resolves fast but gets blocked half the time isn’t cheaper. Independent test data, when it exists, is worth more than a vendor’s own benchmark page.
How They Compare
Public ratings across the platforms that matter for best residential proxies in us:
| Provider | G2 |
| Evomi | 4.4/5 (3) |
| Iproyal | 4.7/5 (844) |
| Webshare | 4/5 (6) |
| Bright Data | 1.5/5 (2) |
| Oxylabs | 4.5/5 (429) |
| Proxy-cheap | 4.9/5 (111) |
| Decodo | 4.6/5 (716) |
| Netnut | 4.9/5 (392) |
| Soax | 4.8/5 (73) |
| Dataimpulse | 4.7/5 (29) |
Quick orientation before the full breakdown:
| Company | Best for | Pricing |
| Evomi | Teams wanting a smaller, closely-run provider | Mid-range, subscription |
| Dataimpulse | Cost-conscious teams needing precise US geo-targeting | Premium, subscription |
| Iproyal | Budget-focused developers needing flexible plans | Accessible, subscription |
| Webshare | Solo developers and small scraping projects | Accessible, subscription |
| Bright Data | Enterprises needing the broadest proxy stack | Premium, subscription |
| Oxylabs | Enterprise-scale scraping with compliance needs | Premium, subscription |
| Proxy-cheap | Budget buyers wanting simple self-serve plans | Accessible, subscription |
| Decodo | Mid-size teams wanting balanced pricing and features | Mid-range, subscription |
| Netnut | Teams prioritizing uptime and static residential IPs | Premium, subscription |
| Soax | Teams needing granular targeting at moderate scale | Mid-range, subscription |
| Rayobyte | Budget datacenter-plus-residential mixed use | Accessible, subscription |
1. Evomi
What sets Evomi apart is its size: a smaller, Swiss-based provider that competes less on raw pool volume and more on direct support access. The company positions itself around ethically-sourced residential IPs and straightforward dashboards, which appeals to developers tired of bloated enterprise consoles.
G2 shows Evomi at 4.4/5 across 3 reviews, a thin sample but a positive one.
Pricing sits at the mid-range tier on a subscription model, putting it above the cheapest entry-level providers but well under premium enterprise pricing.
Best suited for: small teams that want a boutique-style provider with direct access to support staff.
2. Dataimpulse
Dataimpulse runs a self-sourced, consent-based residential network of 90 million-plus IPs across more than 195 countries, gathered through its own app and SDK rather than bought from resellers. For US-focused work, targeting reaches down to state, city, ZIP, and ASN, all included at no extra cost.
Dataimpulse targets down to the state, city, ZIP, and ASN level at no extra cost, which is exactly the precision this audience needs for US-focused scraping – and it’s a core reason the platform shows up so often in discussions of the best residential proxies in us for developers running price and SERP monitoring at scale.
In Proxyway’s independent April 2026 test, the residential pool posted a 99.74% success rate with a 0.97-second average response time, numbers that hold up against providers charging considerably more. Both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 are supported, with rotating and sticky sessions available depending on the job.
Pricing runs pay-as-you-go with no subscription commitment, and purchased traffic never expires – a structure that suits teams whose scraping volume swings week to week. On G2, Dataimpulse holds 4.7/5 across 29 reviews.
One user wrote on Trustpilot: “I searched for a long time for a residential proxy provider that wasn’t overly expensive and DataImpulse fit the bill. I’ve been using them for the past three months and haven’t had any issues with data scrapping like I had with some other proxy providers.”
Best suited for: cost-conscious developers and small teams running US-focused scraping who need precise geo-targeting without a subscription.
3. Iproyal
The case for Iproyal is straightforward: an accessible price point paired with review numbers that are hard to ignore. G2 lists Iproyal at 4.7/5 across 844 reviews, one of the larger review samples in this space.
The platform covers residential, datacenter, and mobile proxies under one account, which appeals to teams that don’t want to juggle multiple vendors for different proxy types.
Pricing stays on the accessible end with a subscription model, undercutting most premium competitors while still covering core geo-targeting needs.
Best suited for: budget-focused developers who want one account covering multiple proxy types.
4. Webshare
If you need a free tier to test before committing budget, Webshare delivers: it’s one of the few providers with a genuinely usable no-cost plan for small-scale testing. The dashboard is built with self-serve simplicity in mind, aimed squarely at individual developers rather than teams needing multi-seat management.
G2 places Webshare at 4/5 across 6 reviews, a modest but workable signal for a smaller-scale provider.
Pricing sits at the accessible tier on a subscription basis, with plans scaled for solo use rather than high-volume enterprise crawling.
Best suited for: solo developers and small projects that want to test before paying for larger volumes.
5. Bright Data
Bright Data runs one of the largest and most feature-dense proxy stacks on the market, covering residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile IPs alongside scraping APIs and browser automation tools. The breadth is real: few competitors match its combined product surface.
Trustpilot shows a strong 4.3/5 across 1,108 reviews, though G2 tells a different story at 1.5/5 from 2 reviews – a split that likely reflects different reviewer populations rather than a single consistent experience.
Pricing sits at the premium tier on a subscription model, positioned for larger budgets and enterprise procurement cycles rather than lean startup spend.
Best suited for: large organizations that need a full proxy and scraping-tool stack under one vendor.
6. Oxylabs
Oxylabs built its reputation on enterprise-grade infrastructure: dedicated account management, compliance documentation, and a proxy pool sized for the largest scraping operations. G2 shows the provider at 4.5/5 across 429 reviews, a solid figure at real volume.
The product line extends well past residential proxies into scraping APIs and web-unblocking tools built for teams with dedicated data-engineering headcount.
Pricing lands at the premium tier through subscription plans, reflecting the enterprise sales motion behind it.
Best suited for: enterprise data teams that need compliance support and dedicated account management alongside proxy infrastructure.
7. Proxy-cheap
The name tells most of the story: Proxy-cheap competes on accessible pricing, and it backs that up with a G2 rating of 4.9/5 across 111 reviews – one of the stronger scores in this list. The platform keeps its offering simple: residential, datacenter, and mobile proxies without heavy add-on tooling.
That simplicity is the appeal for teams that just want working proxies without a sales call.
Pricing sits at the accessible tier on a subscription model, aimed at budget-first buyers.
Best suited for: small teams and individual developers who want low-cost proxies without extra platform complexity.
8. Decodo
Decodo (formerly known under a different brand name) has built a mid-range reputation with a G2 score of 4.6/5 across 716 reviews, a large enough sample to trust. The platform balances feature depth – geo-targeting, session control, scraping tools – against pricing that sits below the premium tier.
That balance is the pitch: enough capability for serious scraping work, without premium-tier billing.
Pricing runs mid-range on a subscription model, positioned between the budget providers and the enterprise-focused names on this list.
Best suited for: mid-size teams that want solid feature coverage without paying premium-tier rates.
9. Netnut
Netnut leans on uptime and static residential IP options, a niche not every provider covers well. G2 rates the provider highly at 4.9/5 across 392 reviews, though Trustpilot shows a cooler 3.7/5 from 94 reviews – worth noting if review consistency matters to a buyer.
The provider markets direct ISP connections for its residential network, which can mean steadier sessions for use cases like account management that need a stable IP over time.
Pricing sits at the premium tier on a subscription model, in line with its positioning toward reliability-focused buyers rather than budget scrapers.
Best suited for: teams that need long-lived, stable residential connections more than raw pool size.
10. Soax
Soax pitches granular targeting as its core strength, with filtering down to city and ISP level across a mid-size residential pool. G2 puts the provider at 4.8/5 across 73 reviews, a strong score at a moderate sample size.
The dashboard supports rotating and sticky sessions with a pay-per-GB structure, which suits teams running variable-volume jobs rather than constant high-throughput crawls.
Pricing lands at the mid-range tier through a subscription model.
Soax tends to work best for teams whose targeting needs are precise but whose volume doesn’t justify enterprise-tier commitments.
Best suited for: teams needing fine-grained targeting at moderate, not massive, scale.
11. Rayobyte
Rayobyte built its name in datacenter proxies before expanding into residential IPs, and that history shows in how the product is packaged: straightforward, developer-facing, without heavy enterprise sales layers. The company has also positioned itself around ethical sourcing claims for its residential pool, a detail that matters to teams wary of resold IPs.
Support documentation is thorough for a provider at this price point, which helps teams self-serve rather than wait on a sales cycle.
Pricing sits at the accessible tier on a subscription model, consistent with its developer-first, budget-conscious positioning.
Best suited for: developers who started with datacenter proxies and want an accessible residential option from the same vendor.
What to Check Before You Commit Budget
Does the provider charge for state and city-level targeting, or bundle it in? Some vendors treat granular geo-targeting as a premium add-on; others, like a few names above, include it standard. That difference alone can swing monthly costs significantly for teams doing US-only work.
Does unused traffic expire? A subscription that resets your balance every 30 days punishes teams with uneven scraping schedules. Pay-as-you-go models without expiration dates protect against wasted spend.
Is the IP pool sourced transparently? Ask how the provider gets its residential IPs – through consent-based apps and SDKs, or through channels that are harder to verify. This affects both ethics and long-term ban rates.
Does the success rate hold up under independent testing, not just vendor claims? Third-party benchmarks matter more than a company’s own dashboard metrics.
Can the platform handle both rotating and sticky sessions? Scraping jobs and login-dependent workflows need different session types, and not every provider covers both cleanly.
Match the provider to the job in front of you, not the one with the loudest homepage. The right fit depends on your volume, your targeting depth, and how your budget actually flexes month to month.